FPM BOPF SPACE Between Fields and label
Hi, I'm facing to an issue when I create my UIBB with the FPM_FORM_UIBB_GL2.When I put the label on cell A and the input field in cell B. the tabel is placed between is placed in Cell A to end of B and...
View ArticleRe: FPM BOPF SPACE Between Fields and label
Hi, We can able to restrict the label in a single cell iteself. You can able to change the position of the field in the field attributes. Also we could not able to share the cell for two different...
View ArticleRe: FPM BOPF SPACE Between Fields and label
thank you for your replyDo you have an example please?I try to change the position in the attribute of the field but it does not take my changes.
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: FPM BOPF SPACE Between Fields and label
Yes. we can able to change that. It should have the effect. Regards,Dinesh
View Articlefetching records from different BO
Hi all, I have two business objects for 'CUSTOMER' and 'TRANSCATIONS' ,iam creating particular transcation records using the Customer id (guid) as one of its attribute.but if i want to see all the...
View ArticleRe: fetching records from different BO
Hi Vipin Appu, I'm not that sure if your model really fits. Can an instance of a TRANSCATION (btw. is it TRANSCATION or TRANSACTION) exist without a CUSTOMER? If no, TRANSCATION should be a subnode of...
View ArticleRe: fetching records from different BO
hi Martin Fischer, I am doing a demo project for practicing the BOPF frame work, the scenario i have taken is a simple insurance company, this is how i designed the BO first -company -customer/agent...
View ArticleRe: fetching records from different BO
Hello Vipin, if your BO model looks like that: Customer BO:Attribute "CustomerID"Transaction BO:Attribute "TransactionID"Attribute "RefCustomerID" (foreign key to Customer BO) You have two options:...
View ArticleNot able to access T code /BOBF/CUST_UI
Hi Experts,Apologies for asking such a silly question at the forum, but did not find any other option to understand, hence posting my query. When tried to execute T code, "/BOBF/CUST_UI, getting...
View ArticleRe: Not able to access T code /BOBF/CUST_UI
Hello Mounesh,you have to add "/n" in front of the transaction as it starts with a namespace. Just type in "/n/BOBF/CUST_UI" and it should work out of the box. You could also try transaction "BOPF_EWB"...
View ArticleRe: BOPF Determination based on requested fields
Thanks guys for your answers. @Martin: I've seen that behaviour in the debugger and it makes sense in a statefull scenario. I'm in a stateless scenario in my case but this is another topic. @Tillmann:...
View ArticleForeign key relations not maintained on DB
Hi, what about foreign key relation between PARENT_KEY field in a subnode DB table to the DB_KEY field in the DB table of the superior node? As far as I see such relations are not maintained in the...
View ArticleRe: Foreign key relations not maintained on DB
Hello Jürgen,BOPF's association definition is built on top of DDIC, thus there is no need for BOPF to have the information stored in the database table's metadata. Of course you could add those...
View ArticleRe: Foreign key relations not maintained on DB
Hi Tilmann, ähem, as far as I know CDS design time does not know anything about BOPF meta data but classical DDIC metadata are evaluated. Furthermore, for me it would be simply a question of meta data...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Extra authorization check in case of node categories
Hi experts, I have an authorization object and authorization field linked to a component of my BO node. This worked correctly, but after adding multiple node categories and disabling the default node...
View ArticleRe: Foreign key relations not maintained on DB
Hello Jürgen,you could maintain that information manually on the table, but BOPF does not take that information into account. I agree, that it would be nice to have that information in case accessing...
View ArticleRe: Extra authorization check in case of node categories
Hello Bjorn, might be the case that we are to restricted here. If possible, please open a ticket on component BC-ESI-BOF for further clarification. If this is not possible for you, please send me a...
View ArticleRe: Extra authorization check in case of node categories
Hi David, Thanks for your response! I will create the ticket as you proposed. Kind regards,Bjorn
View ArticleSemantical difference symsgty /bobf/cm_frw=>ty_message_severity ?
Hi,ok, this may be a technical detail but what is the semantical difference between the types symsgty and /bobf/cm_frw=>ty_message_severity ? As far as I see there is none. Please help. It would be...
View ArticleRe: Semantical difference symsgty /bobf/cm_frw=>ty_message_severity ?
Hi Jürgen, indeed, there is no semantical difference. With /bobf/cm_frw=>ty_message_severity you define the message type which is issued as you do with symsgty when you use the message command....
View Article